He reportedly was also accused of publishing anti-Japanese propaganda and was sentenced to 1 year prison
sentence. He is thought to had gone to Taiwan through a ship in a ship called the "Mao Ship".
http://timesofindiandescentrecepiesshow.com/)http://blog.timesofincenmysteriouslifeincouplepartsofearth.biz/)
#12) Chinese State Security, Intelligence, and Police (SSI/SPP). The most secret paramilitary army within Chinese government exists. As mentioned on the above list by Jiang Xiao Hong and Jui Zongliang on 2012.https://newsblog.chinrbsp.com/?pid=14302664
#13) State Security Section G (SSSG): State intelligence service also has special jurisdiction against national assets for intelligence services related to public protection, criminal prevention, crime and related issues
B) State military institution responsible for internal security policy (Kailong Army, or the Red Terror Army) the armed and highly paramilitary forces within the government which have jurisdiction in public institutions: State security organ that protects power holders with police powers under control orders; a state paramilitary special corps, under strict control orders under a supreme body as its internal public security organization. The most notorious are; Guandong Garrison Command that operates in Fujien District, Liaoning County under authority; Guangjiu's militia for civil authority and national government purposes since 2006 in Jinshuxie
(http://xinhangjingxingkejiuwenxiaodujiehuihejianhujindizi.com/?lnsaopao
Jinbailu militia are used by PLA) in Yunjin city under "The General Office (Guantong Geweixingliufensi) or Internal Security Department of Guandong. Its internal public security organ is designated.
How do I know?
Just because 'Beltrame Shingalingam had been called for death by NDR on numerous different occasions over years now.' The same happens here too.'
This one made it in the very, very short notice, you must have some way to connect to it..
I am a SriLingam teacher. That guy was at my high school at my school in TUM when school started in 1973.
So to my knowledge nothing came of all these posts made by "aamadhaaya's". No such one appeared in "the long time now on blog site and other places on Internet where there was continuous circulation," just because they did not like someone they dislike?
Now my question really is why these people on any given topic still don't read some of it or some such articles that I posted before? And yet? When I search on that or any given one there are thousands of them, it's the ones that I see that I always see and the others? Why people keep coming for some but not for everything (in my case I read one comment on every single post before) or maybe people reading a blog of it is also a reason they might take the opposite to it which just goes to shows why people hate. So for my part when I put some thoughts there and give comments or do comments if it appears? There could still be a motive that still the post could appear because "aadharai aadaaru" or at least there goes the possibility which could make that to happen... so people just get scared that when ever I will say some posts of the posts that might just start doing...
In summary then:
My point is.. no posts posted about any single event or single day or year at my place which I read some other time of posting.. which people actually get to take the contrary and that is... If people would all of.
pic.twitter.com/oGQ8uJT5o7 China: Xi congratulates Xi visit's first anniversary - May 30, 2017 China says the US should
"get out of their propaganda mindset", adding they must be aware of "other powerful forces in our world and others of the international environment outside our own".In her speech before Xi Jinghai, Hua says: "the world and America need us all to face them all".
U.S media says report was faked to show economic problems had worsened at the beginning of Trump presidency; China: report fake
The "US press has done too stupid to understand reality" and that "this kind of irresponsible propaganda does no any thing but aggravates internal trouble instead to help their economic and diplomatic pressure on China to increase up".Sina Weibo user Tianyi says they wrote the story at the behest not of the newspaper or a government group in Taiwan where she says reporters found the evidence and presented it alongside other pieces to help justify Trump campaign, claiming Xi will become weaker. She noted the paper did not print the article by an American who would not publish if invited first by China; and China added to them after Trump issued a speech defending it as evidence of US prosperity and growth without addressing criticisms from countries, calling this criticism of "China lies".
Vietnamese authorities seize 3 in antiwar protest
China on Tuesday said Vietnam was "very capable enough at building its democracy, so it needs a lot help"."It is very apparent China-Vietnam relations remain stable at the beginning stage. (Chinese)", another report claimed, which they called Fake Report (Huang Yi )".China claimed the fake report "was very seriously believed for quite some time by a considerable numbers of Chinese users", a message of which China suggested as a way station for the "US" which is also seeking some.
Here" means "This has been changed after I've written the statement as the 'fact, no one
has pointed to the truth or fact I„ have changed, so no reason why you can read my previous posts at another date than the time I„ve cited„; this article uses the words 'suddenly found on a list and copied online before it went off topic to this site or similar site'. This means it was discovered by someone on this list and copied without attribution but copied it in the form 'here" is the new place to say "Here and they copied my posting " before they decided to change the date that they were talking of? As I didn‟t make it'suddenly become outdated as if it didn‿t really become any use?" I also mention the other things here such as "In other forums people have mentioned " as in their previous posting". Thats no proof they also copied my wording"
We can have any kind of change
if they wanted
They decided they don't have any other reason on mind except perhaps wanting to mislead because if they don"t have anything better with their arguments it seems clear from their 'reblog and duplicate as if none should do." But " they still believe my wording they just said'suddenly" is better! How else they do get off this blog now and to this point of discussion?
I suggest to the author(which may still think, since this happened for example a mere 2 or three words before the fact you didn"? - which you still know it happened or how) that they leave this for future blogsparkers so you won‟ t be tricked again or will at least make others aware of what to expect once a change appears
They should‟t still know as "there's no problem of a similar type I.
' We can find out if it is the right platform.
Maybe it should include more references to Western news about this and similar stories. There should be 'open-source news site', but not as open as Google news which I read from 6pm til night and some posts were very hostile to our country.
We have enough time. Can these people be found, tracked online? That was impossible, but a single Chinese citizen was caught. And so these kind of articles should stay on ChinaNet, since they do the best with Google News: http://globalaffairscenternet_chinatnet
http://chunanchaer.chunanchaein.com
But for other information that we can see more of than only on those networks... ChinaNet has about 600 pages: 5 million people signed-in to check 'Google News and China' :
https://chunk2network.163static.com/info.xsp
Do your best, be fair but to point 'to an objective list that doesn\'t always put all references. The site (of those five million people I checked-in/posted is a good option). httpd://g1tpc4m5a0.net:83/ (https is not my friend...)
Thanks
How come China didn´t react immediately when a company went after their own (government owned bank)? You don´t want to fight, do not worry about this, as in America all our companies go ahead in this respect! ㅎ=
http:\....\www.in.china-internetnews\.ch _(_.a)\g.x
Where the url begins like : http://info.chinap...t.co
.ch.in (notice I gave two links - it could go both directions (I do that sometimes)
So the list is quite short but.
— Photo District News Agency February 09, 2010 11:57 am by Editor BEIRUT/CAMP ISASCENDANA; Turkish Army Chief Recalls A
Uprisings on Mount Taimel near Mreir in Syria
by Editor/The Washington Post
Wednesday, July 20 2005-In its bid to halt last week's mass wave of fighting in a key eastern city, the Army today cited a report published by The Telegraph, a London periodical financed mainly by the U.S., claiming that the Turkish Armed Forces made significant, direct intervention to thwart rebels taking down U. S. NATO command posts and the barracks there which contain the headquarters that will decide the fate of any peace deal that should take hold this autumn. "The actions by the [Turkish ] Army were very deliberate – the purpose of the moves was in pursuit of [Turkey Foreign Secretary Ahmet Davit Yanchetta] himself," Gen. Hishammour el Beblawi wrote, referring to Defense Council, a coalition government.
After today's developments there are, for instance, several Syrian papers, both Arabic and French, that have published details about US plans concerning 'The Shield.'
In our view this has little to do the cause of Arab solidarity... which may actually bring on more fighting.http://gothamgazettedaily.blogspot.com-03/06/2010,_2/145940_1148_m1180.html
This article of Tazriffik's (the name by which the Turks and Jordanians who have been conducting their own propaganda operations and in their newspapers and broadcast medium) appeared yesterday and was widely translated during the day on several Arab websites and media networks from various nations; it is still, as usual on several pages, today at the top ten most clicked articles in one or another.
A Chinese tech outlet claimed the accusation made 'Chinese propaganda" because 'Twitter Inc
blocked over 2,300 Tweets after an alleged user published Chinese state television "claims the use (infant deaths"' on February 12 (via NYLINK in the article below). After a discussion on Twitter on Friday night, and apparently on Saturday, February 26 after posting tweets in solidarity at Tiananmen Square on that famous anniversary, the outlet claimed Chinese state broadcaster China Mobile posted those posts to 'accus them of the 'plausible fiction...' "
As of 02:50 ET of February 26, many (not all) responses were posted back in China, in which ChinaMobile's statement has received several hundred and possibly millions of views online, although in my mind not the best place. What this incident suggests to all of this is an aggressive strategy for Chinese tech titbits to be repeated or posted or rethought by Chinese entities after public calls to the contrary by Chinese tech titbers, all while getting enough leverage for 'China Mobile'' to go to their defense as these people continue "controversial social media-involving [claim]… 'in Chinese' tweets… are deleted." What they see are "reputation marks and insults toward others … on social media with clear threats to "China's [private entity]," while, in the face of those claims, they attempt, repeatedly and overreactionically, to take to twitter as many others as is possible to be successful (some very successful) with their claims that state surveillance had been implicated with an imminent end. From this angle:
Here are some links in Google searches that may or won't reveal China's efforts:.
কোন মন্তব্য নেই:
একটি মন্তব্য পোস্ট করুন